In a recent three-quarter page Toronto Star advertisement, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) and the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU) have complained that the government’s proposed legislation, Bill 160, will endanger Ontario’s workers. Using some selective statistics, the joint advertisement claims that injuries and deaths have decreased since WSIB assumed responsibility for prevention in 1998.
It also claims that Bill 160 would represent an unfair tax load for some employers, apparently ignoring the present unequal burden of prevention costs.
The advertisement also suggests the Ministry of Labour – who is responsible for the Occupational Health and Safety Act – might not be the best place to locate prevention services. Noting that the whole point of the OHSA is to create workspaces that minimize or eliminate work injuries, it is not altogether easy to follow this logic.
It is hard to escape the fear of job losses at the WSIB as the main thrust behind this advertisement. That might be a legitimate and justifiable concern, but from our reading of the proposed legislation, we fail to see the peril that this legislation might introduce to the workplace.
It should be remembered that when Bill 99 created the WSIB, there was great fanfare in the announcement that the new Board would function as ‘an insurance company’. Responsibility for rehabilitation was off-loaded because that was not the proper job of an insurer, we were told. So it might seem to be ironic that when we are in the midst of rehabilitation services returning to the WSIB, they are losing prevention services – something else that never really seemed to jive with being ‘an insurance company’.
Posted by Paul Harris
On March 29, the government of Ontario filed amendments to Regulation 632/05 – which is not even scheduled to come into force until July 1, 2011. The newly introduced regulation (O. Reg. 95/11) consolidates the confined space requirements already found in other regulations into the upcoming Regulation 632/05. This affects specific rules already in effect for mines and mining plants, healthcare and residential facilities, industrial establishments, and construction projects.
However, the amended Regulation 632/05 maintains the distinction between confined spaces provisions for construction projects and those that apply in other workplaces.
Contact Workplace Health and Safety Network for any assistance required in preparing for the new rules.
Posted by Paul Harris
On March 3, 2011, Minister of Labour Charles Sousa introduced Bill 160, an act to amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA). At this point, it has only undergone First Reading so there may be a long road ahead before it might become law. Since Ontario is facing a provincial election in October this year, it might die on the order paper before an election ever occurs.
The gist of the Bill is to remove from the WSIA (and, thus, from the WSIB) oversight for health and safety certification and training.
There is also the intent to create a Prevention Council and a Chief Prevention Officer under the OHSA although details are scant about what those would be expected to accomplish.
One interesting proposed amendment in the WSIA would see WSIB paying construction workers for their time in regard to fulfilling the requirements to become certified under the OHSA – sort of compensation for learning how to help others not get injured and need compensation themselves.
Since those certification and training matters will no longer be provide by WSIB, does that mean employers can expect to see lower premiums?
Posted by Paul Harris
In late December, 2010, a 10-person Expert Advisory Panel on Occupational Health And Safety released a wide-ranging report recommending significant changes to the OHS system in Ontario. Amongst the recommendations, many of which are expected to result in structural changes to the OHS system or amendments to OHS legislation in the next year are that:
- the government create a new prevention organization to focus the OHS system, increase available information to the employer community, reward and accredit positive health and safety systems by employers;
- mandatory training for new workers, supervisors, health and safety representatives be required;
- enforcement be more stringent for businesses that engage in “serious and willful” contraventions;
- changes to procedures for worker complaints of reprisal, or adverse employer action when they report a health and safety concern, and that prosecutions for reprisals occur;
- mandatory fall protection training be required;
- administrative monetary penalties be imposed by tribunals, in addition to court-imposed fines.
For the complete Heenan Blaikie OHS Group analysis of potential future changes, READ MORE.
Posted by Cheryl Edwards